<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100% Cuban Tobacco Cigars That Are 100% Legal</title>
	<link>http://www.cigarenvy.com/2005/12/14/100-cuban-tobacco-cigars-that-are-100-legal/</link>
	<description>Cigar ratings and reviews, feature articles, news, and information for novice and veteran cigar smokers.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarenvy.com/2005/12/14/100-cuban-tobacco-cigars-that-are-100-legal/#comment-66926</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cigarenvy.com/2005/12/14/100-cuban-tobacco-cigars-that-are-100-legal/#comment-66926</guid>
					<description>Cigar.com is wrong.  The Pinar 3000 line was made, according to Paul Magier, with 100% pre-embargo Cuban tobacco.  The Pinar 2000 line was blended with 70% Cuban tobacco and was a lower-priced line.

Both the Pinar 2000 and the Pinar 3000 have now been discontinued, as Magier's stock of pre-embargo tobacco ran out, according to to statements he made, in 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cigar.com is wrong.  The Pinar 3000 line was made, according to Paul Magier, with 100% pre-embargo Cuban tobacco.  The Pinar 2000 line was blended with 70% Cuban tobacco and was a lower-priced line.</p>
<p>Both the Pinar 2000 and the Pinar 3000 have now been discontinued, as Magier&#8217;s stock of pre-embargo tobacco ran out, according to to statements he made, in 2006.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig Bunck</title>
		<link>http://www.cigarenvy.com/2005/12/14/100-cuban-tobacco-cigars-that-are-100-legal/#comment-66612</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cigarenvy.com/2005/12/14/100-cuban-tobacco-cigars-that-are-100-legal/#comment-66612</guid>
					<description>Ok, here is my question;

you say

&quot;Pinar 2000, with Cuban wrapper and some filler, blended with Ecuadorian binders and some Nicaraguan filler leaf, in five shapes&quot;

Cigar.com says;

&quot;Today Pinar uses this rare leaf in their Pinar 2000 line, a cigar blended with 100% Cuban fillers and a wrapper and binder from Ecuador.&quot;

Who is correct?

I can't seem to find any</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, here is my question;</p>
<p>you say</p>
<p>&#8220;Pinar 2000, with Cuban wrapper and some filler, blended with Ecuadorian binders and some Nicaraguan filler leaf, in five shapes&#8221;</p>
<p>Cigar.com says;</p>
<p>&#8220;Today Pinar uses this rare leaf in their Pinar 2000 line, a cigar blended with 100% Cuban fillers and a wrapper and binder from Ecuador.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who is correct?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t seem to find any
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
