From Karin Goodwin at The Sunday Times, Scotland:

He may have saved the country from Nazi occupation but even Winston Churchill is not exempt from the tentacles of political correctness.

Because of the ban on smoking in public places, Britain’s greatest wartime prime minister will be without his trademark cigar when he is portrayed on stage at the Edinburgh Fringe festival later this year.

Mel Smith, the comedian and actor who will play him in a production of Allegiance, a play about a little-known meeting between Churchill and Michael Collins, the Irish revolutionary, could be forced to use a plastic replacement.

[more…]

From Rich at CigarCyclopedia comes this news:

Another draconian smoking ban goes into effect today in the Canadian province of Ontario, including the formerly cosmopolitan city of Toronto.

“There is a cigar culture in Toronto,” noted Stephen Hajtun, speaking to The Globe and Mail, Canada’s most respected newspaper in an interview last week. Not any more, Stephen.

The ban covers smoking in all enclosed spaces, including retail tobacco stores!

“The impact will be disastrous” was the comment from well-known tobacconist Thomas Hinds, whose store in the Yorkville section of Toronto has been a destination for smokers for 35 years.

[more…]

If you have not been living in a cave for the last thirty years of so, you have been exposed to a lot of talk about the dangers of “second-hand” smoke.

Everyone knows that second-hand smoke is dangerous. We hear it constantly — especially in this time when smoking bans are commonplace and that proverbial cave looks like the last place that smokers will be allowed to hide in to light up.

Until, of course, someone complains that the bats and other cave wildlife will be harmed by tobacco.

One important statistic on the dangers of second-hand smoke comes from a definitive, careful study showing a clear-cut link between second-hand smoke and cancer in humans. The findings of the study, undertaken by the World Health Organization, were published in 1998. Their multi-year investigation found an unquestionable 22% relationship between cancer in adults and whether or not they had been exposed to “second-hand” smoke as a child.

A 22% relationship between second-hand smoke and cancer is much too clear to dispute. It is not a statistical anomaly. It is a proven fact.

The only problem is that the WHO study found a 22% decrease in the chances of adults getting cancer who had been exposed to smoke as a child.

More below the fold…

[more…]

Under the heading of “stop the insanity,” here’s the latest craziness on the myth of second-hand smoke.

The assault on smoking is moving into its next phase. Not satisfied with outlawing smoking in public buildings, and even near public buildings in many places, the True Believers continue to mount pressure to prevent smoking in private homes.

The press release which follows on the dangers of second-hand smoke does not come from the American Heart Association. It does not come from the American Cancer Society. It does not come from the Lung Association.

No, my friends, this warning of how second-hand smoke is a silent killer of the innocent comes from…

(drumroll, please)…

PETA.

That’s right. The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The group that brings you naked models, naked actresses, and naked celebrities promoting how evil it is to wear furs by their “I’d rather go naked” ads.

That, PETA.

Hang on to your hats. This one is…

…well, I’d call this a shaggy dog story, but it is really more of a fluffy kitty.

[more…]

From Michelle LaLonde, The Gazette

When Steve Siozios opened his tiny cigar bar on Crescent Sreet. 10 years ago, friends told him he was crazy.

“Everybody called me an idiot; they said cigar bars are passe, they’ll fade out of style. Now all the bars and restaurants resent me for being so lucky,” chuckled Siozios, the amiable owner of Stogies Cigar Lounge on Crescent St. in downtown Montreal.

What’s suddenly so lucky about owning a cigar bar in Quebec?

[more…]

From Rich Perelman at CigarCyclopedia:

A looming time bomb is ticking, which if it explodes in November, may close many of the retail tobacco stores in the state of California.

It goes by the name of “The Tobacco Tax Act of 2006.”

The latest initiative to come from the anti-tobacco lobby, this bill seeks primarily to raise the tax on cigarettes by 13 cents apiece or $2.60 per pack. The state already has an 87 cents per pack tax and the resulting $3.47 per pack rate would be the highest in the nation.

The measure creates a “Tobacco Tax of 2006 Trust Fund” in the state treasury, which in turn will fund a variety of health programs such as research and a variety of anti-tobacco advertising and promotional ventures for state and local government use.

But the insidious nature of this proposition is that California is the only state which links its tax on cigarettes to what are known as “other tobacco products” (“OTP”). These include cigars, pipe tobacco, smokeless, little cigars and roll-your-own cigarettes. It is this aspect of the proposition which will destroy California’s smokeshops. While the tax rate is not specified in the proposition, the state’s Board of Equalization would be required to impose a tax rate “equivalent” to the rate on cigarettes.

[more…]